When the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only completed In case the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence as well as petitioner company responded to the allegations as a result they were very well aware about the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to become appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Case law is specific on the jurisdiction in which it had been rendered. For example, a ruling within a California appellate court would not ordinarily be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The law enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair on the offender as well as the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nevertheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based around the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. Additionally they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance struggling with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They can be directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
As being the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been achieved, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of your Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year old boy from his home to protect him from the Terrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced experienced in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children during the home. The boy was placed in an unexpected emergency foster home, and was later shifted about within the foster care system.
For those who find an error from the information of a published opinion (for instance a misspelled name or maybe a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, Additionally it is a well-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
Do you think you're looking for Court Information? You can use our site to search for any case or search for your person. Information to the site is updated every 24 hours at 3:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found within the search site is provided to be used as reference material and isn't the official court record.
Federalism also performs a major role in determining the authority of case regulation in a very particular court. Indeed, Every circuit has its very own list of binding case legislation. Consequently, a judgment rendered within the Ninth Circuit will not be binding in the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
Summaries of cases that condition the lives of young individuals, making certain a further understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and fans alike.
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is properly established now that the provision for proforma promotion is not alien or unfamiliar for the civil servant service construction however it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule website 17, wherein it can be lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may perhaps if contented that a civil servant who was entitled to generally be promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his possess, wrongfully prevented from rendering service into the Federation/ province during the higher post, direct that such civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay out and allowances of such higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a perfectly-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.